

Yesterday, The Gateway Pundit reported that Trump-backed Abelardo De La Espriella had won the Colombian presidential election over the weekend. Current President Gustavo Petro, however, called the results into question. Petro is forbidden from reelection and is contesting the election on behalf of Ivan Cepeda, his party’s candidate.
Since the initial reporting from The Gateway Pundit, President Petro has continued to call into question the election results on social media via his X account.
How will the Establishment Media react to these claims for “audits” and scrutiny over the Colombian election compared to President Trump’s continued scrutiny of unverifiable election results in the United States? Several claims from President Gustavo Petro are strikingly similar to those uncovered regarding the 2020 election, including unsigned precinct documents and electronic modifications to databases.
/*! This file is auto-generated */!function(d,l){“use strict”;l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&”undefined”!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll(‘iframe[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+’”]’),o=l.querySelectorAll(‘blockquote[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+’”]’),c=new RegExp(“^https?:$”,”i”),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);//# sourceURL=https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
The “scrutiny” from Petro began last night with a post and video claiming that polling stations did not have signatures from board members, and those votes “must be challenged” immediately. The claim from the president is strikingly similar to a report from The Gateway Pundit in December 2025 regarding unsigned poll tapes accounting for hundreds of thousands of votes in Georgia’s Fulton County during the 2020 election.
Deben ser impugnadas las mesas sin firma de jurados de inmediato.
Aun no se puede saber quién es el presidente y hay muchas irregularidades pic.twitter.com/ckgHIsajCn
— Gustavo Petro (@petrogustavo) June 21, 2026
The above post was followed by another, where Petro claimed “the registry is uploading E14 forms without signatures from polling officials.”
Informe de testigos digitales.
Está subiendo la registraduría formularios E14 sin firmas de jurados.
Esas mesas deben ser de inmediato impugnadas es estricto que los formularios vayan firmados por los formularios E14.
La votación casi empatada, nadie llega al 50% obliga a… pic.twitter.com/JusU3kgcWU
— Gustavo Petro (@petrogustavo) June 21, 2026
Petro’s claims evolved into scrutiny over the software used by Colombia, referencing a 2018 Council of State ruling that it should be replaced with “public software.”
The lame-duck Colombian president stated, “I warned that the software of the Bautista brothers was vulnerable” according to the 2018 report. “I timely requested an expert audit of the Bautista brothers’ software, and the registrar did not allow it.”
He stated that they have “evidence” of “a change in IP addresses of several servers of the national registry” suggesting that it amounts to the software being “compromised” and that “others wrote data for polling stations and voting posts.”
Advertí que el software de los hermanos Bautista era vulnerable según la sentencia del Consejo de Estado del 2018 y que debía cambiarse por un software público,
Solicité a tiempo una auditoría experta del software de los hermanos Bautista, y el registrador no lo permitió.…
— Gustavo Petro (@petrogustavo) June 21, 2026
Another post claims that “scrutiny lawyers” are being prevented from entering Corferias, a convention center in Bogota, the country’s capital. In the post, Petro requested national police and judges to allow the lawyers entry.
No están dejando entrar los abogados de escrutinio en Corferias de Bogotá.
Le solicito a la policía nacional y a los jueces de escrutinio dejar entrar a todos los abogados de escrutinio.
Solo los jueces determinan quien es el presidente de Colombia.
Toda declaratoria hoy de un… https://t.co/YQ1x7RP1Eg
— Gustavo Petro (@petrogustavo) June 21, 2026
Another post from Petro mentions previous calls for “the registrar and the prosecutor” to allow a “technical audit of the software” prior to the first round of voting and a demand to restore the “Hash lock and timestamp” to ensure the E14 forms were not altered after being uploaded, claiming that it was done to him during his previous election.
“They called me crazy and anti-democratic, as if electoral transparency were a matter for violent people who want to set the country on fire,” he wrote. “What sets things on fire is the lack of electoral transparency.”
Le pedí al registrador, y al procurador la accion positiva a mi solicitud, que permitieran la auditoría técnica del software antes de primera vuelta y en segunda vuelta demandé que se recuperara inmediatamente el candado Hash y la estampilla del tiempo, para asegurar que no se…
— Gustavo Petro (@petrogustavo) June 22, 2026
Petro also called into question the overseas vote, claiming that, “we’re inching toward the Peruvian situation, where it’s the overseas vote – especially in the U.S. – that puts the president in office.”
La diferencia de votos en el exterior es de 177.000 votos a favor de Abelardo todas las mesas están impugnadas.
Ahora entendemos porque nos tumbaban a todos los cónsules que nombraba.
Nos acercamos a la situación peruana, en dónde es la votación del exterior, especialmente en… https://t.co/RAxNFZitjb
— Gustavo Petro (@petrogustavo) June 22, 2026
Early this morning, Petro posted that he had “asked the police to detain every person who assaults others over the right to scrutiny” in a repost of a video claiming a councilman had “assaulted the lawyers who are recovering the votes” in Medellin, Colombia. The video, however, shows a man in a blue vest shaking hands with another.
The post itself mentions “vote-buying in Colombia” and “coercion of workers by employers seeking to defeat the labor reform that benefits workers.”
Le pido que a la policía detener a toda persona que violenta a otras por el derecho a los escrutinios.
A quienes apoyaron el gobierno máxima prudencia y sabiduría nos provocan para enterrar el pais en la violencia como a mediados del siglo veinte.
El ministro del interior debe… https://t.co/BkzEZ18fsU
— Gustavo Petro (@petrogustavo) June 22, 2026
Mainstream media outlets thus far has begrudgingly reported the Trump-backed De La Espriella as the winner; however, several outlets are reporting that the results are contested and that they were “razor-thin“.
The Gateway Pundit will update the story as more is learned regarding Petro’s claims and the outcome of Colombia’s presidential election.
The post “ELECTION DENIER!” Colombian President Gustavo Petro Calls to Audit Software in Colombian Election Following Trump-Backed Victory appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
