A corrupt Nevada court and state officials torpedo Solid Findings of Fraud in the 2024 Election.
This is just another story about the sad truth that our votes aren’t counted in a truthful way, they are merely placeholders for manipulation. The focus of this effort to shine a light on the truth is on a proprietary database known only to the software architects associated with the voting machine companies.
Think about the 250+ years of work of Patriots who created, fought and bled in order to forge America into the world superpower it is today. Then, our supposedly elected ‘leadership’ fooled us into believing they were working for our best interest, but were instead robbing us blind once installed into their positions through stolen elections.
With what we know now, it’s likely that a majority of those in power today didn’t even win their election legitimately, as their victories were mostly contrived and stolen. Multiple avenues, including computer algorithms selected them at the direction of the real ‘kingmakers’ of the Deep State who decide behind the scenes ‘who will win what’ in order to keep their cabal in power.
As corrupt as government officials were in the past before computers, the trend has accelerated since computers are able to install so many more ‘at the flick of a button’. The result is the bizarre cast of characters in office who are easily manipulated into not supporting laws that favor common sense, but instead stand for bizarre twisted unconstitutional mandates. We actually lived through that bizarre world from 2020-2024, when good people were re-designated as “Domestic Terrorists”, and every day it just got worse and worse.
We wouldn’t have even known how elections are stolen algorithmically had it not been for the work of https://tinapeters.us/. The corrupt leadership she exposed lawfared a way to lock her up for 9 years in order to silence her.
This brings us to today with the case of Andy Thompson vs. the Secretary of State of Nevada. Andy along with some very savvy database and accounting individuals discovered that the vote totals went up (and down) during ‘election season’. Surprisingly, per Exhibit 2 from the case, over 40,000 ballots were added to the count on November 11th, six days after the 2024 General Election. These ballots that didn’t even have a vote for either Trump or Harris on them. A little suspicious? A lot suspicious given their ability to massively alter outcomes of nearly all down ballot races in Nevada (and yes, practically everywhere).
Andy and his team boldly prepared a Pro se case to challenge Nevada on their reported results. In the process they also discovered that Arapaho County, CO had the same patterns of fraud woven throughout its results. After a few court appearances, and what looked to be a good shot at proving intentional fraud (even across state lines), the Judge pulled a fast one (and in the opinion of this author, that ‘fast one’ was likely due to threats of the Deep State), and POOF, Andy’s case was just dropped (wow, what a surprise).
The circumstances and manner of the Dismissal raise serious questions as it embraced the denial of due process (cutting off the Plaintiff’s rights, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 18 U.S.C. § 241 and 242), the destruction of election records (federally mandated to be preserved for 22 months, 52 U.S.C. § 20701) and affirmed that Nevada is effectually a state in rebellion (rejecting republican principles in both its Constitution and Statutes, Art IV § IV [Guarantee Clause] of the U.S. Constitution). Below is a chart demonstrating the absence of republican principles now on court record in the State of Nevada that shows how Nevada is a LAWLESS State in a still LAWLESS Country:
Andy has begun the appeals process filing three Motions and two Notices of Appeal as of Friday, June 20th.
Here are the findings as presented to Andy Thompson by forensic computer analyst Greg Senstrom:
The June 18, 2025 Order from Judge Jacob A. Reynolds in Thompson v. Nevada Secretary of State (Case No. A-24-906377-C) is procedurally and substantively flawed—and highly vulnerable to appeal or constitutional challenge. Here’s a breakdown of what happened, what it signals, and what Andy Thompson’s options are:
SUMMARY OF THE COURT’S ORDER
Disposition:
Case dismissed with prejudice on procedural grounds, Plaintiff’s motions denied, including his Emergency Motion to Preserve Evidence, No opportunity granted to respond to the AG’s final reply brief filed June 11, 2025.
LEGAL AND PROCEDURAL DEFECTS IN THE ORDER
1. Judge ruled without allowing Plaintiff to respond to the final dispositive filing. The AG filed their Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss on June 11, 2025.
Thompson was never given a hearing or chance to respond, violating fundamental due process rights (Nev. Const. Art. 1, § 8; U.S. Const. amend. XIV).
This violates NRCP 12(f) and EDCR 2.20(e), which allow responses to be fully briefed before rulings.
2. Judge Reynolds repeatedly mischaracterized Pro Se procedural compliance
The court claimed Thompson failed to serve motions, yet the record includes certificates of service and the AG filed substantive responses, waiving any service defect.
The judge also claimed the amended filings were “excessive” and “unlawful,” yet only one amendment is required to be accepted by right under NRCP 15(a).
Pro Se litigants are entitled to reasonable leniency. The court acknowledged that but punished Thompson for pursuing corrective filings after AG pointed out technical defects.
3. Judge ignored preservation obligations under 52 U.S.C. § 20701
Despite Thompson’s Emergency Motion to Preserve Forensic Election Records (filed March 25) and cited evidence of imminent data overwriting, Judge Reynolds refused to issue a TRO—even temporarily.
The AG admitted systems were being updated, but claimed “future retention compliance” was adequate.
This is a clear abdication of equitable preservation authority under both federal and state law.
4. Plaintiff’s evidentiary record was not reviewed or ruled upon
The court’s order makes no reference to the 203-page Amended Complaint, or to:
26,902 vote decrement data,
96% undervote in 41,489 ballots,
Parallelism analysis and Dominion CVR anomalies.
Instead, the order focuses solely on service, amendment mechanics, and dismisses the case as procedurally defective—ignoring the claims and facts entirely.
WHAT THIS MEANS IN REALITY
Judge Reynolds wanted to close the case without ruling on the merits.
He used technical procedural criticisms (amendment sequencing, service nitpicks, and filing redundancy) to avoid a hearing.
The AG and the court ignored Thompson’s preserved constitutional rights, even after he explicitly raised them in the Emergency Reconsideration Motion.
There is strong circumstantial evidence of collusion between the AG’s office and the court to suppress the evidence before the mock election and software overwrite (June 23–27).
NEXT STEPS FOR ANDY THOMPSON
Motion for Reconsideration (if Nevada rule permits)
Highlight denial of opportunity to respond to AG’s final reply,
Assert due process violation and improper sua sponte rulings,
Attach evidence of service, filings, and suppression of hearing.
Appeal to the Nevada Supreme Court
Frame as a violation of procedural due process, denial of hearing, and abuse of discretion.
Raise federal preservation statute violations (52 U.S.C. § 20701), Show preemptive suppression of forensic election evidence before mock election and machine overwrite (a fact now proven).
File federal § 1983 civil rights action in U.S. District Court (Nevada)
Named Defendants:
Nevada Secretary of State,
Deputy AG Laena St-Jules (in official capacity),
Clark County Registrar (for destruction of evidence),
Possibly Judge Reynolds (if factual basis exists for acting outside jurisdiction).
Sadly, America remains hijacked, however one thing is for sure, this all needs to be solved in time for the Midterm Primaries which begin within a year.
If the Deep State can pull of stealing the House and Senate, President Trump will be an instant Lame Duck President, and many impeachments will follow in order to neuter his agenda.
The post BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Corrupt Nevada Court and State Officials Torpedo Solid Findings of Fraud in the 2024 Election first appeared on Joe Hoft.