Below is a list of Hand-Count Methods that we are tracking, some developed by us, most by others. We welcome the “better mousetrap!”, so if we’ve missed any, please let us know.
Each method we list must be Acceptable, and as quickly as we can, we’ll evaluate jurisdictions where the methods are Permissible (according to statute/code, which can be changed by the People, but not overnight), and we’ll indicate which methods we Recommend.
To be Acceptable, a method must be both 100% transparent (in real-time, and after the fact, e.g., through publicly available recorded video which shows the tallying and the ballots tallied), which no machine does/could achieve, and 100% accurate (a function of procedural reconciliation to catch and correct any error).
Acceptability is the Peoples’ standard. Permissibility is the States’.
To be Recommended by us, a method must be Acceptable, is likely to be Permissible, and is likely to be both efficient (time- and manpower-wise) and low-risk (e.g. doesn’t involve egregious ballot-handling, etc).
Acceptable Methods
State Statutes & Administrative Code (Permissibility)
PLEASE NOTE: The following observations represent independent reviews of individual state statutes, which were current on the date evaluated, but may have changed since. These observations are not intended as legal advice. Please review the most current version of your own state statute and the sections referenced below. We strongly encourage you to do your own research and take action accordingly. Please feel free to reach out to us if we can support you in your efforts!
| State | Statute | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| CA | CA Elec Code § 10.5 (2025) Says California has an “Office of Elections Cybersecurity” but dos not specify any required qualifications thereof. CA Elec Code § 17 (2025) Details SoS’s “administrative complaint procedures, pursuant to the requirements of the federal Help America Vote Act of 2002 (52 U.S.C. Sec. 21112), in order to remedy grievances in the administration of elections” CA Elec Code § 303.3 (2025) “A remote accessible vote by mail system shall not be connected to a voting system at any time.” CA Elec Code § 335.5 (2025) “and performance of the manual tally of 1 percent of all precincts.” CA Elec Code § 2112 (2025) “2112. Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, the fact that a person certifies to his or her United States citizenship by signing his or her affidavit of registration shall be deemed evidence of citizenship for voting purposes only.” CA Elec Code § 2188.1 (2025) “2188.1. The Secretary of State may insert fictitious names of voters into the voter registration information database as an investigative and enforcement tool for determining inappropriate or unauthorized uses of voter registration information.” CA Elec Code § 13400 (2025) Fascimile copies of ballots. CA Elec Code § 14026 (2025) (e) “Racially polarized voting” means voting in which there is a difference, as defined in case law regarding enforcement of the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 (52 U.S.C. Sec. 10301 et seq.), in the choice of candidates or other electoral choices that are preferred by voters in a protected class, and in the choice of candidates and electoral choices that are preferred by voters in the rest of the electorate. The methodologies for estimating group voting behavior as approved in applicable federal cases to enforce the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 (52 U.S.C. Sec. 10301 et seq.) to establish racially polarized voting may be used for purposes of this section to prove that elections are characterized by racially polarized voting. CA Elec Code § 14274 (2025) “In any election where ballots are to be counted both manually and by electromechanical tabulating devices, the marking device used for marking ballots to be counted electromechanically may be used for marking ballots to be counted manually.” CA Elec Code § 17601 (2025) Preservation of electronic data. CA Elec Code § 19004 (2025) 19004. Voting equipment may be loaned or rented for any purposes with the consent of the board of supervisors, if payment for the expenses incident to the use of the machine is made. CA Elec Code § 19006 (2025) 19006. It is the intent of the Legislature that: … (c) The Secretary of State study and encourage the development of voting systems that use nonproprietary source code and that are easy to audit. And (f) A local jurisdiction may use available public funds to research and develop a nonproprietary voting system that uses disclosed source codes, including the manufacture of a limited number of voting system units, for use in a pilot program or for submission to the Secretary of State for certification. CA Elec Code § 19381 (2025) Certification of Voting Systems. | 1) Who is part of this Office? Can grassroots citizens get involved this way? 2) What are the “administrative complaint procedures…to remedy grievances in the administration of elections” as required by this statute? 3) Good! How is this verified? 4) Is this manual tally of 1% done via hand count? 5) Seems remarkable to just say “yes, I’m a citizen” with no proof whatsoever required. 6) This statute prompts many questions. How many fictitious voters can be inserted? What is the process for removing these and ensuring they don’t vote? Who is overseeing the SoS’s actions on this? 7) This statute prompts several questions… first, is this use of “facsimile” referring to a photocopy or a fax? how common was faxing in 2017 that this statute really needed to be added, effective 1/1/2018? Second, why are there precincts that require fax copies of a ballot in certain languages? Why must the election official prepare the fax copies at least 10 days before election day, when the voter has until 7 days before election day to request it? Finally, (c) is very concerning, as it states “(c) This section does not limit an elections official from distributing facsimile copies of the ballot more widely than as required by subdivision (a) or earlier than required by subdivision (b).” which gives them permission to distribute even more fax ballots than are requested or required. 8) Racially polarized voting. Wow. 9) 14274 seems to say that, if hand counting, BMDs can be used to count ballots that will be hand counted. 10) 17601 seems to suggest that CVRs and hash files should be preserved for 22 months. 11) 19004: For any purposes? How about penetration testing or forensic cybersecurity evaluation? 12) Seems like a statute grassroots could use to push back on current systems in use 13) Seems to indicate cast vote records (CVRs) are open to public inspection. |
| State | Statute | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| CT | CT Title 9 Elections Code 2026 Chapter 141, Sec 9-7a(s)(g)(1)(A through C) “Written complaints and statements” CT Title 9 Elections Code 2026 Chapter 141, Sec 9-7b (ALL) Details authority of the commission to investigate and levy $2000 fines as the result of investigations done by the commission or town clerks or registrars of voters. Includes violations of HAVA “by any person who believes there is a violation.” CT Title 9 Elections Code 2026 Chapter 145, Sec 9-150a (h) (h) Procedure manual. The Secretary of the State shall provide a procedure manual for counting absentee ballots. The manual shall include a description of the steps to be followed in receiving, handling, counting and preserving absentee ballots. Facsimile ballots shall be printed in the manual, illustrating potential variations in ballot markings along with the correct interpretation to be given in each situation illustrated. CT Title 9 Elections Code 2026 Chapter 145, Sec 9-163k Pilot Program for absentee voting (2)(e) (e) After the municipal elections and primaries held in 2003, the State Elections Enforcement Commission shall survey election officials and participants in the three municipalities participating in the pilot program for absentee voting. Not later than January 15, 2004, the commission shall submit a report on its findings and recommendations concerning the pilot program to the joint standing committee of the General Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to elections. CT Title 9 Elections Code 2026 Chapter 145a, Sec 9-163aa Early in-person voting Early voting window is 15 days pre-election through 2 days pre-election; for non-presidential primaries, shrinks to 8 days pre-election to 2 days pre-election. CT Title 9 Elections Code 2026 Chapter 146, Sec 9-236b Voter’s Bill of Rights (6) Cast a ballot using voting equipment that accurately counts all votes CT Title 9 Elections Code 2026 Chapter 146, Sec 9-238 Voting Tabulators Required (a) Except as provided in section 9-272, voting tabulators shall be used at all elections held in any municipality, or in any part thereof, for voting and registering and counting votes cast at such elections for officers, and upon all questions or amendments submitted at such elections. CT Title 9 Elections Code 2026 Chapter 147, Sec 9-272 Voting Methods, Conditions under which use of voting tabulators may be discontinued If, owing to the number of candidates to be voted upon, owing to inability to obtain a sufficient number of voting tabulators or, if it is found impracticable to use voting tabulators at any election, primary or referenda to be held in any municipality, or in one or more of the voting districts therein, the registrars of voters may discontinue the use of such tabulators for such election in any of the voting districts therein, and shall thereupon cause ballots to be procured and used at such election, primary or referenda in each of the voting districts wherein the use of voting tabulators has been so discontinued. The procedures for securing and counting the paper ballots described in this section shall be in compliance as nearly as possible, in the manner prescribed by the Secretary of the State, with the procedures for securing and counting absentee ballots. CT Title 9 Elections Code 2026 Chapter 148, Sec 9-311 Election Canvass and Returns This seems to state that recanvass (recounts) appear to be conducted by tabulation machines BUT reference Chapter 147 Elections, Sec 9-242b (3) which states “(3) If a recanvass of the votes is required pursuant to chapter 148, the recanvass officials shall, in addition to the other requirements of said chapter, conduct a manual tally of the individual, permanent, voter-verified, paper records contemporaneously produced by each direct recording electronic voting tabulator used within the geographical jurisdiction that is subject to such recanvass. The manual tally conducted for the recanvass shall be limited to the particular candidates and questions or proposals that are subject to recanvass. If the manual tabulation of such contemporaneously produced paper records does not reconcile with the electronic vote tabulation of a particular direct recording electronic voting tabulator or tabulators, such contemporaneously produced paper records shall be considered the true and correct record of each elector’s vote on such electronic voting tabulator or tabulators and shall be used as the official record for purposes of declaring the official election results or for purposes of any subsequent recanvass, tally or election contest conducted pursuant to chapters 148 to 153, inclusive.” | 1 & 2) Possible avenue for grassroots: this section details the process for written complaints filed with the State Elections Enforcement Commission. 3) It would seem as though SoS can permit hand counting of absentee ballots. 4) If this pilot program was established over 20 years ago, why hasn’t it been terminated or ratified by this point? 5) Would be worth working toward legislation to reduce this early voting window. 6) Specific right being infringed. 7) Unfortunate language requiring tabulators. BUT, 8 & 9) Could this offer a possible Hail Mary strategy for grassroots? |
| State | Statute | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| FL | FL ss. § 97.0291 (2025) No private or NGO funds can be accepted or used by any state agency or local official responsible for conducting elections. FL ss. § 98.0981 (2025) Precinct-level election results FL ss. § 101.019 (2025) Ranked choice voting is prohibited in Florida. FL ss. § 101.56065 (2025) (1) (a) and (4)(a) are interesting, detailing “voting system defects” FL ss. § 101.5607 (2025) (1)(a) says the program code (software) is on file with the Department of State and if not on file, it cannot be used in an election. FL ss. § 101.591 (2025) Voting system audit procedures. FL ss. § 102 (2025) Conducting Elections and Ascertaining Results – Florida also holds simulated elections for minors. FL ss. § 102.071 (2025) Results must be posted. | 1) So who paid for the ballot dropboxes in Broward County? 2) If Florida grassroots aren’t already requesting the “precinct-level election results” described in (3) (a-c), they should probably start doing so. (3)(c) details what info the files include. (6) states that these are publicly available. 3) Good! 4) Who has access to view this software? 5) Seems like hand count is possible, as long as it’s completed within 7 days after certification of the election by the canvassing board. 6) Are these simulated elections on the same day as actual elections? 7) This section doesn’t specify the manner of the counting, and would appear not to exclude the possibility of hand counting. Tabulation software is mentioned but does not appear to be required. 8) Additional note: Florida has provisions for mail-in voting, early voting, and exemptions to the need to provide voter ID. Also, the governor can suspend or delay any election by calling a state of emergency or impending emergency. This may be because hurricane season is already underway by Election Day. |
| State | Statute | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ID | ID Code § 34-104 (2025) Must reside in state and county for 30+ days prior to election ID Code § 34-114 (2025) defines “tally book” or “tally list” ID Code § 34-218 (2025) Private money is prohibited >$100 ID Code § 34-408 (2025) Must register to vote before 5pm on 11th day before an election. If registration occurs after this, county clerk holds application until registration re-opens after the election. BUT ID Code § 34-408A (2025) states that a person CAN register on Election Day at their precinct polling place ID Code § 34-418 (2025) County clerk must check all new registrations weekly to confirm eligibility if the elector had a change of address. ID Code § 34-431 (2025) Any registered elector can challenge any elector’s name on the register and a note is entered regarding reason (died/moved/incorrect address). Challenger signs their name, so that info becomes public. The person being challenged then receives a snail mail postcard and must take action accordingly. ID Code § 34-435 (2025) County clerks are required to cancel the voter registration of any elector who hasn’t voted in any election in the last 4 years. ID Code § 34-901 (2025) Approved ballot security features. ID Code § 34-903B (2025) Ranked Choice Voting is prohibited for any election in Idaho, even federal. ID Code § 34-1007 (2025) Absentee ballots may be opened and scanned 7 days before election day ID Code § 34-1113 (2025) Voter ID requirements ID Code § 34-1413 (2025) Modified voting procedures: A county can submit modified voting procedures to SoS for approval at least 40 days prior to an election. If SoS disapproves this request, SoS must notify the county what remedial measures may be taken that would allow for approval of the voting plan. ID Code § 34-20 (2025) Chapter 20: Contesting an election Chapter 23: Recounts ID Code § 34-2313 (2) and (3) (2025) Details procedure for a small randomized selection of ballots to be hand counted and machine counted ID Code § 34-2407 (2) (c) (2025) Says the governing body may “Provide for the payment for the voting machines or vote tally systems by other means.” | 1) Good. 2) does not specifically mention hand counting 3) would seem to include NGOs 4) Does not seem to specify whether or not election-day registrants can then vote in that day’s election. 5) Is this actually happening? By what method(s)? 6) This would appear to be a potentially viable grassroots strategy. 7) Is this actually happening? 8) This is interesting as there are numerous ballot security options available, but the statute requires only “one or more” to be implemented. 9) Good! 10) Not good! 11) Good, succinct voter ID statute. May provide helpful for states looking for simple verbiage to use as a template. 12) This seems to allow an individual county to request hand counting with this statute but the requester would want to have a well-formed detailed hand counting proposal to submit to SoS. 13) Grounds for contesting a race or ballot initiative are specific and very limited. 14) If difference between sample hand count and machine count is at or below a specified amount, the remainder of the ballots are machine counted; if difference is above specified amount, the remainder of ballots would be hand counted. 15) Despite how this sounds, it would seem that 34-218 would still apply, which would not allow private or NGO funding. |
| State | Statute | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| IL | 10 ILCS, Act 5 § 1-9 Grace period, early, vote-by-mail, and provisional ballots are counted at election authorities’ central ballot counting location, not precincts. 10 ILCS, Act 5 § 5/24A-3 …Any such county board, board of county commissioners or board of election commissioners may contract for the tabulation of votes at a location outside its territorial jurisdiction when there is no suitable tabulating equipment available within its territorial jurisdiction. 10 ILCS, Act 5 § 5/24A-2/24B-2 …”Redundant count” means a verification of the original computer count by another count using compatible equipment or by hand as part of a discovery recount.” | 1) The IL Constitution recognizes that government derives its just powers from the consent of the governed, that enumeration of certain rights cannot deny or disparage other rights retained by individual citizens, that the State must conduct elections to determine the consent of the governed, and that elections must be free and equal. 2) IL statutes neither prescribe nor prohibit hand-counting, but prescribe tabulation by use of equipment approved by the State Board of Elections (SBoE) and available within the jurisdiction. IL statute does identify circumstances (redundant count) whereby a hand-count of some number of ballots to “verify” “the original computer count” is permissible, but does not specify a method for the hand recount. It stands to reason but must be argued in a court that, if some method of hand-counting is both required and permissible in certain circumstances, then it must be permissible if no permissible “computer” is available to conduct the “original computer count. 3) IL statutes do not require voting systems be Federally tested or certified. 4) IL administrative code (Title 26, Ch I, Part 204, Section 204.55) does require all voting system vendors to submit all Computer Code associated with the voting system to be placed in escrow with the State Board of Elections (SBoE). No vendor has ever done this,* therefore every IL voting system has been approved by the SBoE in violation of IL code, and therefore in violation of IL statute (10 ILCS 5/Art. 24), and therefore the SBoE should be compelled to withdraw approval of all currently approved voting systems. * IL uses ES&S, DVS, HI, Unisyn, Premier voting systems; each of these systems uses components with commercial operating systems (OS), e.g. Windows Server, Windows, uClinux, etc. Most use Intel Xeon and I-x series central processing units (CPU) on the motherboards of voting system components (e.g. ES&S, DVS, HI, Unisyn) which also contain Intel active management technology (AMT) chipsets like vPro/ME, running the Minix OS. All Dell servers (used by ES&S and DVS for election management system (EMS) servers) embed integrated Dell Remote Access Controllers (iDRAC), which employ specific drivers, discrete basic input output system (BIOS) firmware, and software like Dell OpenManage. All of these systems use dozens or hundreds of firmware drivers for various components. Vendor-proprietary code is only a small subset of the total Computer Code on voting systems, but vendors have not been compelled to submit all code from the voting systems, nor has the SBoE, or any other party, evaluated it, and IL code, and therefore statute, has thus not been satisfied. |
| State | Statute | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| NE | NE Code § 32-110.01 (2025) Electronic Voting System, defined NE Code § 32-123 (2025) Voter ID requirements NE Code § 32-213 (2025) Oath and bond NE Code § 32-306 (2025) Cannot register to vote after the 3rd Friday prior to an election. Of note, “Deputy registrars shall not register voters after 6 p.m. on the third Friday preceding any election. A registration application received after the deadline shall not be processed by the election commissioner or county clerk until after the election.” This rule is re-stated in Sections 32-308 and 32-310. NE Code § 32-901 (2025) Ballot counting NE Code § 32-959 (2025) Special election by mail; undeliverable ballots; removal of names. The names of voters whose ballots are returned as undeliverable shall be subject to removal from the voter registration records as provided in sections 32-326 to 32-329. NE Code § 32-1010 (2025) Ballots; where counted. NE Code § 32-1041 (2025) Cannot vote using a machine, but tabulators are allowed. NE Code § 32-1044 (2025) Watchers are allowed for LAT NE Code § 32-1119 (2025) Recounts. | 1) Of note, it reads “of which each part is done electronically” not “any part” 2) Voter ID section is clear and concise – great template for other states looking for example language 3) FYI Election commission takes oath and provides $10k bond 4) Would this mean that voter rolls could be obtained immediately after the application deadline and just prior to the election, to ensure no changes were made in this 2 week time period prior to the election? 5) Three separate sets of instructions: manually counted; optical scanner counted; and “with an electronic aspect” 6) Is this actually happening? 7) Seems to allow for the possibility local hand counting at polling stations. 8) Hand counting seems like it would be allowable with SoS approval? 9) Potential grassroots action item: become a watcher for logic and accuracy testing 10) Recount procedure must be same procedure used in the original count. |
| State | Statute | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| OH | OH Rev Code § 3501.05 (O) (2025) Election Duties of SoS include providing an annual report to the Ohio Governor detailing the results, cost, tabulations, etc. of each election. OH Rev Code § 3501.05 (Q) (2025) SoS is required to clean up voter rolls and remove ineligible voters and (W) establish and maintain computerized statewide database under HAVA. OH Rev Code § 3501.051 (2025) Minors can participate in simulated elections at the same place and time as each real general election. Under age 14 needs to be accompanied by an 18 year old, otherwise no other restrictions. OH Rev Code § 3501.08 (2025) Oath required of election officials says they will enforce election laws OH Rev Code § 3501.11 (2025) Election board duties include (J) investigate irregularities; (N) provide an annual report to SoS detailing all costs, number of votes cast, etc.; (T) and (U) must keep and clean voter rolls. OH Rev Code § 3501.12 (A) (2025) Board of Elections salary is based on population of county per census. OH Rev Code § 3501.18 (C) (2025) Maximum precinct size is 1400 OH Rev Code § 3501.22 (A) (2025) 4 election officials at each precinct. BoE can appoint more if deemed necessary. These can be high school students who are at least 17 years old. OH Rev Code § 3501.31 (2025) precinct election officials oath contains the phrase “I will endeavor to prevent fraud” OH Rev Code § 3503.152 (2025) details the procedure for the “annual review” of statewide voter registration database to identify noncitizens, lacks real teeth. Looks like this process takes more than 60 days, requires the registrant to notify the DMV that they are a non-citizen, and then register to vote, and then again notify the DMV that they are a non-citizen. The process cannot be conducted during the 90 days prior to any election. OH Rev Code § 3505.27 (2025) the method by which ballots are counted is up to the BoE. Seems there is nothing preventing or encouraging hand counting of ballots. OH Rev Code § 3505.30 (2025) States the count should never be made later than 12Noon on the day following Election Day. OH Rev Code § 3505.331 (2025) Board must audit general elections and primaries held in even-numbered years. The SoS decides whether the audit is RLA, percentage-based audit, or “another audit protocol approved by SoS.” OH Rev Code § 3505.27 (2025) the method by which ballots are counted is up to the BoE. Seems there is nothing preventing or encouraging hand counting of ballots. OH Rev Code § 3506.5 (B) (2025) Board is appointed (2 members by SoS; 1 member by House Speaker or minority leader; 1 member by Senate president or minority leader) to certify voting equipment: “to examine and approve equipment and its related manuals and support arrangements.” OH Rev Code § 3506.15 (2025) SoS determines the manner of counting and provides each BoE with specific rules and instructions. OH Rev Code § 3506.18 (C) (2025) In a recount, if the original ballots were cast using electronic voting machines, “the voter verified paper audit trail shall serve as the official ballot to be recounted.” Method of recount is not specified; it would appear hand counting could be used. OH Rev Code § 3506.23 (2025) “A voting machine shall not be connected to the internet.” (May 2, 2006) OH Rev Code § 3515 (A) (B) (C) (2025) There appears to be no specification as to how recounts shall be counted. | 1) It would seem that citizens seeking detailed information about the cost of their elections, equipment, contracts, etc., could request this report to obtain relevant cost information. Same for 3501.11 annual report from Election boards to SoS. 2) How many non-citizens are going unidentified due to this cumbersome, lengthy, and weakly designed procedure? 3) 3505.331 (a) “ A risk-limiting audit protocol, which shall use statistical methods to limit to acceptable levels the risk of certifying an incorrect outcome for a particular race, question, or issue. The protocol shall require bipartisan teams of election officials to physically examine and hand count randomly sampled ballots and to continue the hand counting until the results of the hand count provide sufficiently strong evidence that a hand count of all of the ballots would confirm the election result declared under section 3505.33 of the Revised Code or until all of the ballots have been hand counted, whichever occurs first.” If a hand count is part of the RLA protocol, then there must be an approved hand-counting method. Also, if the SoS selects “0%” as the risk-limit for the RLA for each race and issue, all ballots (and all races/issues) will be hand-counted. (b)(i) Similarly, if SoS selects “percentage-based audit protocol,” the SoS can select “100%.” (b)(ii) If there are discrepancies between machine-counted and hand-counted, greater than the SoS-selected accuracy (preferably “0” error/risk of certifying an inaccurate machine count), board physically examines and hand-counts a second set of “randomly sampled ballots equal to a given percentage of the total number of ballots cast in the county at that election, as prescribed by the secretary of state. The second set of ballots shall not include any ballots that were included in the first set of audited ballots.” (2) SoS may require the board to “physically examine and hand count all ballots cast for that race, question, or issue.” 4) 3506.5 Who is on this board currently and what are their qualifications for evaluating voting equipment? (https://www.ohiosos.gov/globalassets/elections/bvme/ohio-bvse-members-_10jun25.pdf – basically: none. Four board members are from county boards; the 5th, non-voting, is a “cybersecurity expert” w/no offensive/defensive/forensic experience or skills). Board appointees are paid for this service. 5) Additional resource: Ohio Secretary of State Election Official Manual Chapter 11, page 12 covers manual hand count procedures. Click here for manual. |
| State | Statute | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| WY | WY Stat § 22-1-102 (xxx) (ii) (2024) “Tally sheet” referenced WY Stat § 22-2-113 (e) (2024) Voter rolls. WY Stat § 22-3-109 (2024) Poll lists are public. WY Stat § 22-3-115 (2024) “Can” cancel voter registration if elector doesn’t vote in any general election. WY Stat § 22-8-108 (2024) Counting Board WY Stat § 22-10-110 (2024) Machine requirements. WY Stat § 22-14-105 (f) (2024) Counting ballots. WY Stat § 22-16-111 (2024) Recounts. WY Stat § 22-16-113 (ii) (2024) Recounts. WY Stat § 22-17-101 (a)(iv) (2024) Contesting elections: races. WY Stat § 22-17-106 (a)(iii) (2024) Contesting elections: ballot propositions. | 1) Hand counting is referenced (tally sheet). 2) (e) Annual voter roll mandatory update February 15th each year via county clerks and (d) says all election records are public. ID is required and must register at least 14 days before an election 3) Poll lists are generated in triplicate 10+ days prior to an election and publicly posted. 4) Is this actually happening? To what degree? 5) If paper ballots, no counting until polls close. But if electronic counting, counties can start preparing absentee ballots for counting on or before election day. What is the reasoning behind this? 6) Could citizens object to machines within this specified timeframe, given that the machines do not meet the VVSG 2.0 standards? May be worth looking into. 7) Doesn’t forbid hand counting. 8) Could 25 electors use affidavits to request a recount via hand count? Would each affidavit signer subsequently owe the county $500 if election results were not changed as a result of recount? Might still be worth it. 9) Or would the affidavit signers collectively owe a maximum of $3000? Language is not fully clear. But if a race is strategically selected for recount, this could be worth fundraising for, based on citizens’ suspicions of foul play. 10) This wording seems to suggest that proof of more than one illegal vote would justify contesting a race. 11) Same as #10 for ballot propositions. |
More states will be added once their hand-count permissibility has been evaluated. If your state is not listed, our team has not finalized evaluating your state’s statutes as they pertain to hand-counting.
Ready to get moving?
Check out The Missouri Method Train the Trainer Mastery Class and read the detailed e-manual using the links below:
Missouri Method Hand-Count Resources
Calculate Hand Counting Needs and Expenses
This handy spreadsheet tool, created by Linda Rantz, will help you calculate your state or county’s specific needs. Find out how many people you need, how many teams, the estimated costs, the approximate time required, the cost per ballot, and much more!
This versatile tool allows for quite a lot of customization depending on your local needs, budget, time available for counting, etc. Instructions and samples/examples are included right inside the spreadsheet.
Training Opportunities
Hand Count Road Show With Mark Cook
April 6 @ 6:00 pm – 9:00 pm EDT
Want us to feature your hand-counting event? You can submit your event here.