The results of the April 1 election for the Wisconsin Supreme Court will became an April Fools joke if they are certified.
Due to numerous issues related to lack of controls and transparency, the recent Supreme Court Election in Wisconsin should not be certified.
We reported before April 1 that the recent election in Milwaukee took place with ballots maintained behind a black curtain and observers not allowed behind the curtains.
We also asked – who is watching over the absentee ballots received before election day?
Who’s Safeguarding Absentee Ballots in Wisconsin? Is Anyone Watching Over Them NOW?
It looks like Milwaukee addressed the black curtain issue from prior elections and instead in the April 1 election covered up rooms so that no one could see into them and prevented observers from coming near to them. This was going on before and during the election.
Here is one room where observers were not allowed in.
Here is another room.
This lack of transparency is a material issue that would not be accepted by professional auditors of integrity in any engagement related to financial reporting in America. If you can’t see what is going on, you can’t certify the results. Any and all items (in this case ballots) that flowed into and out of these rooms would not be included in the election results. If the number of ballots involved can’t be determined you have an even bigger issue.
The Federalist reported:
While votes streamed in during last week’s Wisconsin Supreme Court race, workers in Milwaukee handled ballots in secret back rooms forbidden to observers, according to multiple sources. One of these rooms also allegedly stored vast numbers of blank ballots.
Wisconsin state Rep. Dave Maxey, a Republican, told The Federalist that Milwaukee elections director Paulina Gutierrez blocked observers from seeing multiple rooms in the city’s Central Count, where workers were processing ballots on Election Day. According to Maxey, one of these was the “secure ballot room,” which housed pre-printed blank ballots.
“The reason I wanted to get into those rooms is, ‘Why are you covering the windows? Why did you have mail bins stacked in front of the glass and obscuring people’s view?’” Maxey said. “If there’s nothing to see, let’s be as transparent as a window.”
In Wisconsin’s Supreme Court race on April 1, Republican-backed Brad Schimmel lost to Democrat-backed Susan Crawford 55 percent to 45 percent. The race gave leftists control over the state’s highest court for years. Gutierrez had allegedly been allowing workers to handle ballots in rooms inaccessible to observers for weeks before the election, as The Federalist previously reported, and planned to continue using these secret rooms on Election Day.
The Gateway Pundit reported that various locations ran out of ballots and needed more on election night. It’s unknown if the reason for the ballots being delivered were related to fraud. Our understanding is that ballots can be printed in Milwaukee. What sort of controls surround that process?
BREAKING: Several Counties in Wisconsin Run Out of Ballots During Hotly Contested Supreme Court Race
The bigger question is what about the voter rolls? We are finding in multiple locations like Orange County, California where more than one-fifth of voters in the 2024 election were non-citizens, invalid or phantom voters. What are the odds that there are a significant number of voters in these same categories in Wisconsin?
The April 1 election in Wisconsin is an April Fools joke. When will the civil rights of the people in Wisconsin be protected in elections?
The post EXCLUSIVE: The April 1 Wisconsin Supreme Court Election Will Become an April Fools Joke If Certified first appeared on Joe Hoft.